Ryan Broderick's Cool Time Fun Blog

I work for Buzzfeed and do other internet things.
~ Sunday, December 16 ~
The day after Columbine, I was interviewed for the Tom Brokaw news program. The reporter had been assigned a theory and was seeking sound bites to support it. “Wouldn’t you say,” she asked, “that killings like this are influenced by violent movies?” No, I said, I wouldn’t say that. “But what about Basketball Diaries?” she asked. “Doesn’t that have a scene of a boy walking into a school with a machine gun?” The obscure 1995 Leonardo Di Caprio movie did indeed have a brief fantasy scene of that nature, I said, but the movie failed at the box office (it grossed only $2.5 million), and it’s unlikely the Columbine killers saw it. The reporter looked disappointed, so I offered her my theory.

“Events like this,” I said, “if they are influenced by anything, are influenced by news programs like your own. When an unbalanced kid walks into a school and starts shooting, it becomes a major media event. Cable news drops ordinary programming and goes around the clock with it. The story is assigned a logo and a theme song; these two kids were packaged as the Trench Coat Mafia. The message is clear to other disturbed kids around the country: If I shoot up my school, I can be famous. The TV will talk about nothing else but me. Experts will try to figure out what I was thinking. The kids and teachers at school will see they shouldn’t have messed with me. I’ll go out in a blaze of glory.

In short, I said, events like Columbine are influenced far less by violent movies than by CNN, the NBC Nightly News and all the other news media, who glorify the killers in the guise of “explaining” them. I commended the policy at the Sun-Times, where our editor said the paper would no longer feature school killings on Page 1. The reporter thanked me and turned off the camera. Of course the interview was never used. They found plenty of talking heads to condemn violent movies, and everybody was happy.

Roger Ebert (via ceedling)

If you’re white, they’ll try and explain you, that is.

(via mirkwood)

(Source: guuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh)

17,843 notes
  1. nimonete reblogged this from inkdropfox
  2. sinclairdo reblogged this from wickedfemale
  3. pugglesx reblogged this from ryanhatesthis
  4. zarimonster reblogged this from golden-trash
  5. golden-trash reblogged this from bleedthewineunholy
  6. w-nderlan-d reblogged this from bleedthewineunholy
  7. bleedthewineunholy reblogged this from sassysluteverforever
  8. wannalift reblogged this from the-hottness
  9. love2smile24-7 reblogged this from whiteinnovations
  10. goodusernamesarealwaystaken reblogged this from sassysluteverforever
  11. wondernennie reblogged this from ambivalentanglican
  12. beatdownatthepotluck reblogged this from aplacecalledorange
  13. gregmcewan reblogged this from milesjai
  14. moderate-fundamentalism reblogged this from moderate-fundamentalist
  15. rantinandy reblogged this from ryanhatesthis
  16. faithfulfitness reblogged this from woodlandsway
  17. hey-im-ghoul reblogged this from tyleroakley
  18. kyidyl reblogged this from trials-of-socrates
  19. mimkana reblogged this from trials-of-socrates
  20. trials-of-socrates reblogged this from okayla
  21. hotraisins reblogged this from okayla
  22. drakeology reblogged this from gonewiththewinfrey
reblogged via wavvyseal